Funding opportunities

 

Nuclear Waste Services Research Support Office PhD bursary call 2024/25

 

Submission deadline:

Friday 25th October 2024, 16:00

 

The Nuclear Waste Services Research Support Office (NWS RSO) is pleased to announce the 2024/25 PhD bursary call for proposals. Building on the success of previous years, the scheme continues to provide funding to UK academic institutions for 4-year PhD projects that directly support NWS’s mission to deliver a UK Geological Disposal Facility (GDF). 

The aim of this NWS RSO PhD bursary programme is to develop a portfolio of PhD projects focused on key NWS research priorities. This scheme will train the next generation of geological disposal researchers, support UK capability and expand all aspects of the geological disposal research community throughout the UK.

We have pre-recorded a webinar explaining some of the details of this year’s PhD bursary call: 

 

 

The scheme is expecting to fund several new PhD projects, to commence in autumn 2025, across a broadening research portfolio and inclusive of any research that demonstrates benefit to building the underpinning knowledge and understanding in the ongoing development of the safety case for geological disposal

Each project proposal should have a total cost to NWS of less than £145,000. We encourage projects that can offer added value, for example by identifying co-funding from universities or third parties (either anticipated or confirmed) and/or in-kind contributions. Universities and research groups that have not previously received funding from NWS are particularly encouraged to apply. The contractual arrangements for the PhD studentships will be administered by NWS.

For the 2024/25 bursary call, NWS has developed project briefs in 13 research areas. These project briefs cover a range of disciplines including engineering, geoscience, materials, radiochemistry, sustainability and the social sciences. NWS is also inviting applications to the open topic, for any research project aligned to the NWS mission.

Proposals must be submitted using the application form below and e-mailed to rso-gdf@manchester.ac.uk by 16.00 on 25th October 2024.  All applicants must accept the standard NWS grant terms, a copy of which is available below.

Further information regarding the scheme and the application process can be found in the Guidance for Submission and other documents below. 

If you have additional questions, including about the grant agreement and ability to meet the deadlines, please contact rso-gdf@manchester.ac.uk within the clarification period, which ends on  30th September 2024.

NB – All clarification questions will be answered by NWS and posted publicly on the bursary call page of the RSO website. 

 

Important Dates:

Bursary launch  4th September 2024 
Clarification period close  30th September 2024 
Submission deadline   25th October 2024 
Funding announcement   Late January 2025 
Feedback to applicants  February 2025 
PhD candidates start  October 2025 

 

Clarification Q&A 

Questions will go here.

Q: What evidence of prospective co-funding is required for the application process?

A: We do not require formal evidence to be supplied as part of a submission, however, the status co-funding should be clearly explained in applications. There is the expectation that co-funding stated in application forms will be accessible should the application be successful in gaining the NWS funding requested. Should co-funding not be forthcoming from a third party as stated in the application, NWS reserve the right to withdraw the funding coming from NWS.

Note: Co-funding = Use of host university funds and resources, research council, and/or CDT funds to support the cost of delivering of the PhD programme

Q: What of level of funding would NWS expect/welcome?

A: There is no expectation of co-funding but it is encouraged. This includes both cash and in-kind funding, both should be quantified as part of your submission.

Note: Co-funding = Use of host university funds and resources, research council, and/or CDT funds  to support the cost of delivering of the PhD programme

Q: Can an applicant apply for more than one project?

A: We welcome multiple responses from candidates, with an emphasis quality in what has always been a very competitive selection process.

Q: Are “Open Topic” proposal judged on equal grounds to the other Project Briefs?

A: All project submissions are judged equally against their alignment to the NWS mission and priorities. While for the defined project briefs the areas has already been identified as a priority, NWS’s assessment will equally evaluate those submitted in the open category as per the published assessment criteria. Open submissions have been successfully funded in previous rounds.

Q: Is there opportunity to discuss with NWS the appropriateness of a proposal for the “Open Topic” area?

A: Unfortunately, during the bidding process we are unable to provide additional information, nor an opportunity to discuss individual proposals.

Q: Upon funding being secured and should the PI move institution, would the funding follow the PI, or stay with the student and/or host institution?

A: This would have assessed on a case by case basis, with a balance of considerations between the PI, the host institution (as contracting party) and the individual student considered. 

Q: With regard to the source of rock samples. Does NWS provide rock samples from GDF sites of interest, or must rock samples be collected as part of the PhD project? If the rock samples have to be collected for the PhD project, what types of rock do you expect at the GDF site?

A: NWS would not provide rock samples for this project directly but could provide advice on where suitable rock samples might be obtained including from publicly accessible facilities such as the National Geological Repository [bgs.ac.uk], our partner organisations or from suitable field localities.

Q: Re. Brief 9 - Application of pore-scale modelling and imaging techniques – For the topic area (ii) wormholing, we would like to examine the specifics of when and where the wormholes form and any acidic environments that might be involved. That way I can assess if our modelling software solver can already model this effectively in GDFs and what might be needed for upscaling.

A: In the context of radioactive waste storage, the relevant processes are micro-karstification and karstification of either carbonate or evaporite bearing formations due to infiltration of weakly acidic meteoric water/groundwaters, especially during and post glacial periods.

Q: Re. Brief 8: Application of neural network and machine learning methods to rock mass characterisation – Which datasets are available at the nano, pore, and core scales as training datasets and the gaps that could potentially be filled in by generative techniques.

A: NWS and our partner organisation have collected various digital datasets that could be shared as part of this project. At the pore scale, thin sections and thin section images are available, as are various types of laboratory data that characterise the pore networks. At the core scale, a range of petrophysical, mineralogical and geochemical laboratory data is available as is high resolution core scanning data and geophysical wireline log data. Nano scale data is lacking. At the decametre scale and above, 3D seismic reflection data is also available.

Q: Can an industrial co-supervisor be named that is not NWS?

A: Additional co-supervisor(s) are welcomed.

Q: Is there a need to name the NWS supervisor in the application?

A: The NWS supervision will be allocated post-award.

Additional note: Communication with NWS supervisor will mostly be online, with infrequent in-person meetings and attendance at the annual conference, meaning typical travel and subsistence will cover these meetings.

Q: The form asks us to give some details of “active work”. Could you expand on what that phrase means?

A: Active work refers to the handling of radioactive materials.

Q: In “Guidance” you say “Fees (including overheads, permanent staff costs, estate costs)” but on the application form this heading seems reserved for saying if we have international waivers. Conversely on the application form we have “Directly allocated costs. For example, technician time to support working in external facilities” but DAC is not mentioned on the guidance. I think it would be good if the Guidance document had, under Budget, the same fund headings and descriptions as on the application form.

A: Thank you for the feedback – we will align our guidance and the form for future years. Please budget for the necessary costs as you see fit. 

Q: Can previously submitted applications be resubmitted.

A: We do accept previous submissions. It is expected that either supplied feedback is addressed, there been a change in emphasis and/or changes in co-funding arrangements. We ask that they be put into this year’s proforma.